Pluralism Lost? Defending Hybridism About Being

dc.contributor.advisorJoshua Spencer
dc.contributor.committeememberStanislaus Husi
dc.contributor.committeememberNataliya Palatnik
dc.creatorGustafson, Dane
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-16T19:23:52Z
dc.date.issued2024-05-01
dc.description.abstractOntological Pluralism (OP) is the view that there are restricted existential quantifiers that are at least as natural as the unrestricted existential quantifier. One important question regarding OP that has not received much attention is whether these elite restricted existential quantifiers will be more natural than the unrestricted existential quantifier. In this paper, I defend Hybridism, which is the view that both the unrestricted quantifier and restricted quantifiers are equally natural, from two objections: one relating to its cost in parsimony and the other relating to issues of quantification over certain kinds of entities.
dc.description.embargo2026-07-08
dc.embargo.liftdate2026-07-08
dc.identifier.urihttp://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/88128
dc.relation.replaceshttps://dc.uwm.edu/etd/3576
dc.titlePluralism Lost? Defending Hybridism About Being
dc.typethesis
thesis.degree.disciplinePhilosophy
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Arts

Files