Effect of Conditioned Reinformce Type on Acquisition of Targeting Behavior in Canis familiaris : Clicking versus Vocalizing.
| dc.contributor.advisor | Holt, Daniel D. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Funk, Kristine A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pernsteiner, Jessica L. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2009-08-17T17:48:40Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2009-08-17T17:48:40Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009-04 | |
| dc.description | Color poster with text, images, and graphs (Spring 2009) | en |
| dc.description.abstract | In the 20th century B.F. Skinner converted haphazard animal training into a scientifically based process called operant conditioning. Skinner also discovered that delivering a reinforcer to animals at the exact moment a desired behavior was performed was critical. To solve the problem created by delays in delivery of reinforcers Skinner proposed using a stimulus that could be ?conditioned? as a reinforcer (CR) to signal to an animal that a food reinforcer was coming. The current study tested the hypothesis that dogs will learn faster when a ?Click? CR is used than when a verbal word, ?Good?, CR is used in training dogs to touch and follow a target. | en |
| dc.description.sponsorship | University of Wisconsin--Eau Claire Office of Research and Sponsored Programs. | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/35901 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | USGZE AS589 | en |
| dc.subject | Conditioned response | en |
| dc.subject | Reinforcement (Psychology) | en |
| dc.subject | Operant conditioning | en |
| dc.subject | Dogs--Psychology | en |
| dc.subject | Dogs--Training | en |
| dc.subject | Posters | en |
| dc.title | Effect of Conditioned Reinformce Type on Acquisition of Targeting Behavior in Canis familiaris : Clicking versus Vocalizing. | en |
| dc.type | Presentation | en |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 2.03 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: