Comparing Concurrent Choice and Demand Curve Procedures as Assessments of Reinforcer Value

dc.contributor.advisorLagorio, Carla H.
dc.contributor.authorSalzer, Allyson R.
dc.contributor.authorDahl, Evan R.
dc.contributor.authorToddes, Carlee A.
dc.contributor.authorBarlow, Molly A.
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-14T17:32:45Z
dc.date.available2016-04-14T17:32:45Z
dc.date.issued2015-04
dc.descriptionColor poster with text, graphs, charts, and photographs.en
dc.description.abstractThe current study tested both of these preference measures using the same subjects (Sprague Dawley rats) who could earn two reinforcer types: Ensure liquid diet and grain pellets. Results from this study can provide further evidence as to whether the results of these preference measures align, and can advance our understanding of the factors that influence the valuation of a commodity.en
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Wisconsin--Eau Claire Office of Research and Sponsored Programsen
dc.identifier.urihttp://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/74760
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesUSGZE AS589en
dc.subjectReinforcersen
dc.subjectLab studiesen
dc.subjectPostersen
dc.titleComparing Concurrent Choice and Demand Curve Procedures as Assessments of Reinforcer Valueen
dc.typePresentationen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
SalzerSpr15.pdf
Size:
192.79 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
SalzerSpr15.pptx
Size:
1.96 MB
Format:
Unknown data format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.03 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: