Case Studies in Complementarity: Improving Model Formulation

dc.contributor.authorMunson, Todd
dc.contributor.authorFerris, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-18T17:52:09Z
dc.date.available2013-01-18T17:52:09Z
dc.date.issued1998-11-09
dc.description.abstractOver the past several years, many practitioners have been formulating nonlinear variational inequalities as mixed complementarity problems within modeling languages such as GAMS and AMPL. Sometimes the models generated are poorly specified, either because the function is undefined near the solution or the problem is ill-conditioned or singular. In this paper, we look at information provided by the PATH solver about the model that can be used to identify problem areas and improve formulation. Descriptions and uses of the data provided are detailed via several case studies.en
dc.identifier.citation98-16en
dc.identifier.urihttp://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/64392
dc.subjectmodeling languagesen
dc.subjectPATH solveren
dc.subjectcomplementaityen
dc.titleCase Studies in Complementarity: Improving Model Formulationen
dc.typeTechnical Reporten

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
98-16.pdf
Size:
266.89 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Case Studies in Complementarity: Improving Model Formulation

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.03 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: