Accessibility notice:
If you need help accessing this archived item, Ask a Librarian.
Comparing wetland sampling methods for floristic quality assessment in Superior, Wisconsin
Loading...
Date
Authors
Hlina, Paul S.
Anderson, Derek
Nummi, Katie
Advisors
License
DOI
Type
Technical Report
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Grantor
Abstract
The Wisconsin Floristic Quality Assessment was utilized as a rapid assessment tool in measuring the
plant species diversity and species tolerance to anthropogenic disturbance to a subset of wetland
communities in Superior, Wisconsin. Data was collected, analyzed, and compared for two sampling
techniques: the Whittaker's Plant Diversity Sampling Method (Shmiva 1984) and the Timed Meander
Search Method (Goff et al. 1982) with a goal of identifying a method that best characterizes the
wetland's floristic quality per wetland community over the amount of time and effort expended.
In recent years, a Florsitic Quality Assessment for Wisconsin (WFQA) wetlands has been adopted.
The FQA originated in an attempt to provide a uniform and repeatable method for assessing natural
area quality of both uplands and wetlands in the Chicago region (Wilhelm 1977). Following
refinement of concepts and methodology (Swink and Wilhelm 1994; Taft et. al. 1997), the use ofFQA
rapidly expanded. To date, 10 states (Illinois, Missouri, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, Florida,
North and South Dakota, Indiana, and Mississippi) and one Canadian province (southern Ontario) have
adopted
the FQA as a wetland assessment method to complement other functional assessment to9ls.
' .
The Wisconsin FQA assessment requires an accurate and complete species inventory of the site based
on homogeneity of community type. The method is based on species conservatism. A numeric value
from 0-10 has been designated by leading experts for each vascular species in Wisconsin and is
called the Coefficient of Conservatism (C of C). These values are averaged into a Mean C and then
multiplied against the square root of the total number of native species recorded (BernthaL2003).
·· ·