Be Honest with Me: An Exploration of Lies in Relationships

dc.contributor.advisorErik Timmerman
dc.contributor.committeememberLindsay Timmerman
dc.contributor.committeememberKathryn Fonner
dc.creatorStoll, Arrington
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-16T18:05:48Z
dc.date.available2025-01-16T18:05:48Z
dc.date.issued2013-05-01
dc.description.abstractThis study used Bryant's (2008) lie typology to understand how types of lies (real, gray, and white) compare to one another from the perspective of the individuals engaged in deceptive communication and test whether lies have an impact upon relationship qualities. Data were collected from a total of 246 participants using an online survey. Consistent with the hypotheses, there were significant differences across perceived lie characteristics (intention, consequences, beneficiary, truthfulness and acceptability) across real lies, white lies, and gray lies. The relationship qualities of satisfaction, similarity, trust, and closeness were not associated with the type of lie a participant told. Real lies were found to be the most serious type of lie having malicious intentions, negative consequences, be more self-serving, zero truthfulness, and considered unacceptable.
dc.identifier.urihttp://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/85992
dc.relation.replaceshttps://dc.uwm.edu/etd/165
dc.subjectCommunication
dc.subjectDeceit
dc.subjectDeception
dc.subjectInterpersonal Communication
dc.subjectLying
dc.subjectRelationships
dc.titleBe Honest with Me: An Exploration of Lies in Relationships
dc.typethesis
thesis.degree.disciplineCommunication
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Arts

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Stoll_uwm_0263m_10246.pdf
Size:
491.38 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main File